Anticoagulantes orales directos frente a antagonistas de la vitamina K en pacientes del «mundo real» con fibrilación auricular no valvular. Estudio FANTASIIA / Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in real-world patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The FANTASIIA study

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Comparar los resultados a largo plazo de los anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) frente a los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK) en pacientes del mundo real con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) en un estudio nacional prospectivo. MÉTODOS: El estudio FANTASIIA incluyó consecutivamente a pacientes ambulatorios con FANV anticoagulados con ACOD o AVK desde junio de 2013 hasta octubre de 2014. Se compararon las tasas de eventos según el anticoagulante administrado. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 2.178 pacientes (edad, 73,8+/-9,4 años; el 43,8% mujeres); de ellos, 533 (24,5%) recibían ACOD y 1.645 (75,5%), AVK. Tras una mediana de seguimiento de 32,4 meses, los pacientes con ACOD tuvieron tasas más bajas de ictus -0,40 (IC95%, 0,17-0,97) frente a 1,07 (IC95%, 0,79-1,46) pacientes/año; p = 0,032-, hemorragias mayores -2,13 (IC95%, 1,45-3,13) frente a 3,28 (IC95%, 2,75-3,93) pacientes/año; p = 0,044-, muerte cardiovascular -1,20 (IC95%, 0,72-1,99) frente a 2,45 (IC95%, 2,00-3,00) pacientes/año; p = 0,009- y muerte total -3,77 (IC95%, 2,83-5,01) frente a 5,54 (IC95%, 4,83-6,34) pacientes/año; p = 0,016-. En el análisis de Cox modificado según el método de Andersen-Gill para datos con múltiples eventos, las razones de riesgos instantáneos para los pacientes con ACOD fueron 0,42 (0,16-1,07) para el ictus; 0,47 (0,20-1,16) para la embolia sistémica en general; 0,76 (0,50-1,15) para las hemorragias mayores; 0,67 (0,39-1,18) para la muerte cardiovascular; 0,86 (0,62-1,19) para la mortalidad total y 0,82 (0,64-1,05) para el combinado de ictus, embolias, hemorragias mayores y muerte. CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento con ACOD se asocia con una tendencia a una menor tasa de todos los eventos graves, incluida la mortalidad, en relación con los AVK en pacientes con FANV en España

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term results of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in real-world-patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in a nationwide, prospective study. METHODS: The FANTASIIA registry prospectively included outpatients with AF anticoagulated with DOAC or VKA (per protocol, proportion of VKA and DOAC 4:1), consecutively recruited from June 2013 to October 2014 in Spain. The incidence of major events was analyzed and compared according to the anticoagulant treatment received. RESULTS: A total of 2178 patients were included in the study (mean age 73.8+/-9.4 years), and 43.8% were women. Of these, 533 (24.5%) received DOAC and 1645 (75.5%) VKA. After a median follow up of 32.4 months, patients receiving DOAC vs those receiving VKA had lower rates of stroke-0.40 (95%CI, 0.17-0.97) vs 1.07 (95%CI,0.79-1.46) patients/y, P=.032-, severe bleedings-2.13 (95%CI, 1.45-3.13) vs 3.28 (95%CI, 2.75-3.93) patients/y; P = .044-, cardiovascular death-1.20 (95%CI, 0.72-1.99) vs 2.45 (95%CI, 2.00-3.00) patients/y; P = .009-, and all-cause death-3.77 (95%CI, 2.83-5.01) vs 5.54 (95%CI, 4.83-6.34) patients/y; P = .016-. In a modified Cox regression model by the Andersen-Gill method for multiple events, hazard ratios for patients receiving DOAC were: 0.42 (0.16-1.07) for stroke; 0.47 (0.20-1.16) for total embolisms; 0.76 (0.50-1.15) for severe bleedings; 0.67 (0.39-1.18) for cardiovascular death; 0.86 (0.62-1.19) for all-cause death, and 0.82 (0.64-1.05) for the combined event consisting of stroke, embolism, severe bleeding, and all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with VKA, DOAC is associated with a trend to a lower incidence of all major events, including death, in patients with NVAF in Spain

Inappropriate doses of direct oral anticoagulants in real-world clinical practice: prevalence and associated factors. A subanalysis of the FANTASIIA Registry.

Aims: To describe the prevalence and associated factors of inappropriate doses of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in a national registry of patients of real clinical practice. Methods and results: Five hundred and thirty outpatients with atrial fibrillation treated with DOAC were included in a prospective, national, multicentre study. The appropriateness of the doses of DOAC was defined according to the recommendations of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Mean age was 73 ± 9 years, with a 46% of women. Two hundred and sixty-seven patients were prescribed dabigatran, 190 rivaroxaban, and 73 apixaban. A total of 172 patients (32%) did not receive the appropriate dose: 93 patients received a lower dose (18%) and 79 patients a higher dose (15%). In the comparisons among the subgroups of inappropriately low, appropriate, and inappropriately high dose, we observed significant trends to older age (69 ± 8 years vs. 73 ± 10 years vs. 77 ± 6 years), more frequent female sex (37% vs. 46% vs. 59%), antiplatelet drugs (5% vs. 8% vs. 25%), rivaroxaban (14% vs. 38% vs. 53%), and apixaban use (5% vs. 15% vs. 19%), higher CHAD2DS2-VASc (3.00 ± 1.38 vs. 3.58 ± 1.67 vs. 4.59 ± 1.44) and HAS-BLED scores (1.83 ± 0.87 vs. 1.92 ± 1.07 vs. 2.47 ± 1.13), lower body mass index (30 ± 6 kg/m2 vs. 29 ± 4 kg/m2 vs. 28 ± 4 kg/m2) and glomerular filtration rate (74 ± 27 mL/min vs. 70 ± 22 mL/min vs. 63 ± 16 mL/min), and lower frequency of dabigatran use (81% vs. 47% vs. 28%) (all comparisons P ≤ 0.01). Conclusion: In this real-life study, 32% of patients received an inappropriate dose of DOAC. Several clinical factors can identify patients at risk of this situation.